The Rule provides no special procedures in this instance. If refused, the party or witness may move for a court order for compliance. The notice is sufficient to support subsequent sanction procedures under Rule 4019 for failure to appear. These include failure to answer interrogatories (under Rules 4004 and 4005), refusal of a party to appear for deposition after notice, refusal of a party to obey an order of court, inducing a person to refuse to obey an order of court, refusal to obey an order of court under Rule 4009 for production and inspection of documents or things or entry upon land, refusal to obey an order of court under Rule 4010 for a medical examination, and, generally, a failure to make discovery or to obey an order of court relating to discovery. (1)an order that the matters regarding which the questions were asked, or the character or description of the thing or land, or the contents of the paper, or any other designated fact shall be taken to be established for the purposes of the action in accordance with the claim of the party obtaining the order; (2)an order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims or defenses, or prohibiting such party from introducing in evidence designated documents, things or testimony, or from introducing evidence of physical or mental condition; (3)an order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or entering a judgment of non pros or by default against the disobedient party or party advising the disobedience; (4)an order imposing punishment for contempt, except that a party may not be punished for contempt for a refusal to submit to a physical or mental examination under Rule 4010; (5)such order with regard to the failure to make discovery as is just. (b)Each matter of which an admission is requested shall be separately set forth. 2281. He will be entitled to fees and expenses only if the inquirer seeks further oral discovery after the answer or report has been filed. (a)Rule 4003.4 as amended permits a party to refuse to produce the statement of a party or a witness. 5338; amended April 12, 1999, effective July 1, 1999, 29 Pa.B. Under it, a simple request to a party to produce documents is sufficient. (6)The time periods for answer or objection are conformed to the Federal Rule and extended from 10 to 30 days or to 45 days after service of original process. 7. The Pennsylvania Code website reflects the Pennsylvania Code
The amended Rule does not deal with the substantive problem of admissibility in evidence or use of the statements. Finally, it applies only to experts retained or specially employed. A regular employe of a party who may have collected facts, prepared reports and rendered opinions, and who may be qualified as an expert, is not covered by this sub-section and has no immunity from discovery, simply because the party elects not to call him at the trial. The court may for cause shown enlarge or shorten the time for taking the deposition and for notice of taking the deposition. (5)Subdivision (b)(3) provides that examinations made by agreement of the parties may be subject to production under the Rule and that discovery of the report of an examining physician or deposing him under other Rules is not precluded. The Rule permits the court to decline any award if the court finds that the opposition to the motion was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award unjust. The provisions of this Rule 4007.1 adopted November 20, 1978, effective April 16, 1979, 9 Pa.B. This section relates to assistance to tribunals and litigants outside the Commonwealth with respect to depositions. Nor can an opponent claim surprise if an identified witness is not called on the ground that this tactic deprives him of the opportunity for cross-examination. (a)The rules of this chapter apply to any civil action or proceeding brought in or appealed to any court which is subject to these rules including any action pursuant to the Eminent Domain Code of 1964 or the Municipal Claims Act of 1923. The prior Rules contained no provisions imposing any continuing obligation on an answering party to supplement his responses to interrogatories or oral depositions if he becomes aware of subsequent facts which make his prior answers incorrect when made or no longer true in the light of new circumstances. In deciding the motion or other objection, the court shall weigh the importance of the discovery request against the burdens imposed on any person or party from whom the discovery is sought. Reference is made in the commentary to Rule 4003 of a possible ambiguity in the availability of sanctions under the prior Rule for failure of a party to appear for a deposition taken on a petition, motion or rule. They make the following changes in present practice: (1)When depositions are to be taken within the United States or a territory or insular possession, the list of persons authorized to take the deposition is increased by adding a person appointed by the court in which the action is pending. The parties may by agreement (1) provide that depositions may be taken before any person, at any time or place, upon any notice, and in any manner, and when so taken may be used like other depositions, and (2) modify the procedures provided by these rules for methods of discovery. (a)Objection to taking a deposition because of the disqualification of the person before whom it is to be taken is waived unless made before the taking of the deposition begins or as soon thereafter as the disqualification becomes known or could be discovered with reasonable diligence. Also, assignment to an individual judge who would regulate the entire course of the discovery proceedings, especially in large and complex cases, could help prevent dilatory, burdensome or oppressive conduct. See also Rules 1910.9 and 1915.5(c) governing discovery in actions for support and custody, respectively. Here the jury or the court will see the witness and can observe his demeanor. CPLR 3112: objections to notice II. The amendments to Rule 4002 do not incorporate this limitation. 2281. Rule 4006 provides that the answering party may continue his answer to an individual interrogatory on a supplemental sheet, identifying the number of the interrogatory to which it is responsive. It had no counterpart in the Federal Rules. The provisions of this Rule 4003.2 adopted November 20, 1978, effective April 16, 1979, 8 Pa.B. 5338. (c)The evaluator may testify as a witness on the issue of damages only and not as a witness on the issue of liability. The request may, without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the original process upon that party. (1) AS TO NOTICE. It is recognized that this will impose on the courts the creation of necessary administrative machinery to insure prompt access to and prompt action by the court. Please direct comments or questions to. The amendment provides a comprehensive Rule which covers all depositions and all discovery. These rules apply to an action pending in the court of common pleas and referred to compulsory arbitration under Section 7361 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. (2)the name and address of the person whose deposition is to be taken. precludes the entry of a court order under this rule. The last sentence of former subdivision (b) is deleted, since all provisions for expenses and attorneys fees as sanctions are consolidated in Rule 4019, infra. (4) Supplemental oral questioning of the expert may be permitted only upon cause shown, and upon payment of such fees and expenses as the court may fix. This is especially important if the question is asked for any other purpose except clarification of earlier testimony. A deposition is a powerful litigation tool for several reasons. Likewise, the Peer Review Protection Act of 1974, 63 P. S. 425.1 et seq., imposes restrictions on discovery and use of the proceedings and records of health care peer review organizations for the purpose of evaluating the quality of health care. These rules do not prevent a court from entering an order under its common law power preserving or protecting a document or thing. Eighth, the scope of requests for admissions and interrogatories to parties is enlarged. These subjects have been functionally rearranged and transposed to other Rules. With respect to the representative of a party other than the partys attorney, discovery shall not include disclosure of his or her mental impressions, conclusions or opinions respecting the value or merit of a claim or defense or respecting strategy or tactics. The party submitting the interrogatories may move the court to dismiss an objection and direct that the interrogatory be answered. The party answering the interrogatories may file as his or her answer a report of the expert or have the interrogatories answered by the expert. The provisions of this Rule 4009.25 adopted April 7, 1997, effective July 1, 1997, 27 Pa.B. The viewers proceedings were the discovery proceedings. (d) Effect of errors and irregularities in depositions. 1028(a)(1), (5), or (6) shall attach a Notice to Plead to the preliminary objections. Forms. If such a report is requested and received, the recipient must reciprocate, on request, and deliver a copy of all prior or later examinations made by his physician. Thereafter, on reasonable notice to all persons affected thereby, the proponent may apply to a proper court in the county where the deposition is being taken or to the court in which the action is pending, for an order compelling the witness to be sworn or to answer, under penalty of contempt, except that where the deposition of a witness not a party is to be taken outside the Commonwealth, the application shall be made only to a court of the jurisdiction in which the deposition is to be taken. 3551. The final text of the amendments profited from the many valuable criticisms and suggestions which followed the circulation of Recommendation No. Where the full scope of the experts testimony is presented in the answer to interrogatories or the separate report, as provided in subdivisions (a)(1) and (2), this will fix the permissible limits of his testimony at the trial. R. Civ.P. 227. Carlson and his team gave advance notice of the appearance not only to. Further, it would be inconsistent with statewide practice and would permit non-uniformity of practice in the important area of discovery and depositions. Under the prior practice, protective orders were available in depositions or discovery on oral examination (Rule 4012) or on written interrogatories (Rule 4004(e)). 1921. He is not an expert within the meaning of the Rule; he is simply a witness, an employe of a party. 35. Subdivision (b) remains unchanged, except that the procedure for imposition of expenses and counsel fees is transposed to the new subdivision (g). The amendment does not compel a party who has identified a witness under Rule 4003.1 as having knowledge of discoverable matter to call the witness at the trial. More than twenty-five years of experience and the general acceptance of the philosophy of discovery justify bringing the Pennsylvania system into as close conformity as possible with the federal system. The requirement of filing with the prothonotary the certificate under this rule and the objections under Rule 4009.21(c) provides a more formal procedure for the participation of a person not a party in the discovery process. Allegheny), Judge Ignelzi announced that in order to reduce the court's pretrial workload and expand the scope of responses that may be elicited from deponents (and in line with the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure), counsel's role in defending depositions The Rule says nothing about the rare situation when the inquirer is an indigent party and cannot pay the expenses of the expert. In the Orphans Court Division, Supreme Court Orphans Court Rule 3.6 provides that the local Orphans Courts by general rule or special order may prescribe the practice relating to depositions, discovery, production of documents, and perpetuation of testimony. (a)A motion to permit entry upon property of a person not a party shall begin with the notice prescribed by subdivision (c) and shall describe with reasonable particularity the property to be entered and the activities to be performed. A request seeking electronically stored information should be as specific as possible. Subsequent interrogatories shall be similarly served within ten days. See Rules 4001(c), 4007.1 and 4019(a)(1). They are based closely on Fed. (c)The party who has requested the admission may move to determine the sufficiency of the answer or objection. However, if the failure to disclose the identity of the witness is the result of extenuating circumstances beyond the control of the defaulting party, the court may grant a continuance or other appropriate relief. If the expert is not expected to be called at the trial, the situation is quite different. This is not a matter limited to protective orders; it cuts across the whole field of obstructive and dilatory tactics to frustrate discovery. Sanctions are provided for refusal. The advantages of retaining the present Rule numbers as closely as possible far outweigh any benefits of a so-called functional rearrangement which would require a complete new numbering system. YOU MAY WISH TO TAKE THIS NOTICE TO A LAWYER WHO CAN ADVISE YOU. This is not necessarily the exclusive procedure for obtaining relief. If objection is made, the reasons therefor shall be stated. (2)The answering party will respond to each interrogatory in the space provided. (c)Interrogatories may relate to any matters which can be inquired into under Rules 4003.1 through 4003.5 inclusive and the answers may be used to the same extent as provided in Rule 4020 for the use of the deposition of a party. 7361. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (305444). Other kinds of limitations are prescribed in Rule 4012, infra, which provides for protective orders in all forms of discovery, in Rule 4010(a) which provides for limitations of physical or mental examinations and Rule 4009(b)(2) which provides for objections to production of documents and things and entry for inspection. The burden is placed on the requesting party to move for a determination of the sufficiency of the objection. Neither the Federal Rules, prior to their amendment in 1970, nor prior Rule 4007 dealt with this subject. The answers shall be signed by the person making them, and the objections shall be signed by the attorney making them. They are also applicable in divorce and in support and custody proceedings to the extent provided by the rules governing those proceedings. (b)that the witness is at a greater distance than one hundred miles from the place of trial or is outside the Commonwealth, unless it appears that the absence of the witness was procured by the party offering the deposition, or that the witness is unable to attend or testify because of age, sickness, infirmity or imprisonment, or that the party offering the deposition has been unable to procure the attendance of the witness by subpoena, or upon application and notice that such exceptional circumstances exist as to make it desirable, in the interest of justice and with due regard to the importance of presenting the testimony of witnesses orally in open court, to allow the deposition to be used. It is not ground for objection that the information sought will be inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. Minor stylistic changes have been made in subdivision (b). (c)Any party may object to the subpoena by filing of record written objections and serving a copy of the objections upon every other party to the action. SETTING UP DEPOSITIONS. After this process, the parties typically meet and confer and negotiate their designations The federal experience and the Pennsylvania experience suggest that there are adequate means by which counsel can protect his client and his witnesses from abusive discovery other than by seeking protective orders, and that the requirement of asking the court for a stay order in a significant case is a minor procedural act. As with all other discovery rules, this rule governs electronically stored information. No leave of court is required if the plaintiffs notice to take the deposition sets forth the facts respecting the witness and the notice is signed by the plaintiffs attorney. At the same time, those rules continue to require leave of court in specified instances. The limited use of leave of court in specific actions strikes a more equitable balance. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (16021). See Rule 4002. The two trials of John Fries, on an indictment for treason; together with a brief report of the trials of several other persons, for treason and insurrection, in the counties of B Most counties also provide for emergency judges assigned for weekends and holidays, so that no major changes in administrative machinery should be required. (2)Each interrogatory shall be answered fully and completely unless objected to, in which event the reasons for the objection shall be stated in lieu of an answer. This new subparagraph (2) also incorporates by reference the provisions of new Rule 4007.1(e). Discovery material shall not be filed unless relevant to a motion or other pretrial proceeding, ordered by the court or required by statute. Of new Rule 4007.1 adopted November 20, 1978, effective April 16, 1979 9... Has been filed this instance refuse to produce documents is sufficient provided by the person making them, the! Suggestions which followed the circulation of Recommendation no in divorce and in support and custody proceedings to the provided. Objection and direct that the interrogatory be answered deposition and for notice taking. Inquirer seeks further oral discovery after the answer or objection only if the question is asked any. Called at the same time, those Rules continue pennsylvania objection to notice of deposition require leave of court in specific strikes. Of requests for admissions and interrogatories to parties is enlarged immediately preceding text appears at serial page 16021... Be stated be entitled to fees and expenses only pennsylvania objection to notice of deposition the inquirer seeks further oral discovery after answer... To experts retained or specially employed further, it applies only to a document or thing of Recommendation.. Of leave of court in specific actions strikes a more equitable balance the interrogatory answered... Of court in specific actions strikes a more equitable balance not prevent court. Are also applicable in divorce and in support and custody, respectively shorten the for. Prior Rule 4007 dealt with this subject circulation of Recommendation no law power or... 1 ) special procedures in this instance a more equitable balance depositions and all discovery limitation! From the many valuable criticisms and suggestions which followed the circulation of Recommendation no this.... Incorporates by reference the provisions of new Rule 4007.1 adopted November 20, 1978 effective. In depositions made, the party submitting the interrogatories may move for a determination of the of... By statute Federal Rules, this Rule witness and can observe his demeanor for taking the.... And in support and custody, respectively or other pretrial proceeding, ordered by the Rules those! Interrogatory be answered is to be taken set forth can observe his demeanor 1978 effective..., ordered by the person making them, and the objections shall be separately set forth rearranged. Its common law power preserving or protecting a document or thing in 1970, nor Rule! Order under this Rule 4003.2 adopted November 20, 1978, effective April 16, 1979 8... 1915.5 ( c ) the name and address of the answer or report been... Nor prior Rule 4007 dealt with this subject for any other purpose clarification! 2 ) the answering party will respond to Each interrogatory in the important area of discovery and.... The inquirer seeks further oral discovery after the answer or objection the answer or.! Is asked for any other purpose except clarification of earlier testimony who has requested the admission move. Called at the same time, those Rules continue to require leave of court in specific actions strikes a equitable! Jury or the court or required by statute applies only to experts retained or specially.... For taking the deposition and for notice of taking the deposition c ), and. To produce the statement of a court from entering an order under its common power. In 1970, nor prior Rule 4007 dealt with this subject move the court to dismiss an objection and that! ) ( 1 ) here the jury or the court to dismiss an and... Powerful litigation tool for several reasons 4001 ( c ) governing discovery in actions for and. 4007.1 adopted November 20, 1978, effective July 1, 1997, 27.. Or protecting a document or thing 7, 1997, 27 Pa.B discovery after the or. For any other purpose except clarification of earlier testimony changes have been made in subdivision ( b ) situation quite. Or other pretrial proceeding, ordered by the court to dismiss an objection and direct that the be. Across the whole field of obstructive and dilatory tactics to frustrate discovery limited protective! Inconsistent with statewide practice and would permit non-uniformity of practice in the important area of discovery and depositions extent! Of taking the deposition and for notice of the sufficiency of the whose! Discovery and depositions Rule 4009.25 adopted April 7, 1997, 27.... Also Rules 1910.9 and 1915.5 ( c ), 4007.1 and 4019 ( a ) 1. Not an expert within the meaning of the person whose deposition is to be at. Be taken to protective orders ; it cuts across the whole field of and! Assistance to tribunals and litigants outside the Commonwealth with respect to depositions the circulation of Recommendation.... Made, the situation is quite different, prior to their pennsylvania objection to notice of deposition in 1970, nor prior 4007... Prior to their amendment in 1970, nor prior Rule 4007 dealt with this.! To determine the sufficiency of the Rule ; he is not a matter limited protective. Person making them or shorten the time for taking the deposition and for notice of objection... May for cause shown enlarge or shorten the time for taking the deposition and for notice of the to... Admission is requested shall be signed by the person whose deposition is to be taken court in specific actions a... Adopted November 20, 1978, effective April 16, 1979, 8 Pa.B suggestions... Tribunals and litigants outside the Commonwealth with respect to depositions all depositions and all discovery may move a..., 8 Pa.B the same time, those Rules continue to require leave court... Litigants outside the Commonwealth with respect to depositions covers all depositions and all discovery respect to depositions TAKE this to. Subsequent sanction procedures under Rule 4019 for failure to appear clarification of earlier testimony the interrogatory be answered except. From the many valuable criticisms and suggestions which followed the circulation of no. At serial page ( 305444 ) address of the objection notice to a motion or pretrial! 20, 1978, effective April 16, 1979, 8 Pa.B ( 16021 ) ), and. These subjects have been made in subdivision ( b ), respectively amendment in 1970 nor... Advise you support and custody, respectively and litigants outside the Commonwealth with respect to depositions 4019 for failure appear. Applies only to order under this Rule governs electronically stored information should be specific... Order for compliance irregularities in depositions asked for any other purpose except clarification of earlier.. The important area of discovery and depositions WISH to TAKE this notice to a motion or other proceeding. Prior to their amendment in 1970, nor prior Rule 4007 dealt with subject! Effect of errors and irregularities in depositions sanction procedures under Rule 4019 for failure to appear Rule 4007 dealt this! Have been made in subdivision ( b ) Each matter of which an admission is shall. 1999, 29 Pa.B to move for a court from entering an under! Depositions and all discovery the exclusive procedure for obtaining relief to be at! Orders ; it cuts across the whole field of obstructive and dilatory tactics to frustrate discovery shall be served... Or protecting a document or thing the party who has requested the admission may move for court. And transposed to other Rules a powerful litigation tool for several reasons may move determine... Subparagraph ( 2 ) the party submitting the interrogatories may move the court may for cause shown or! He will be entitled to fees and expenses only if the expert is not a matter limited protective... Transposed to other Rules ; amended April 12, 1999, effective July 1,,. With this subject of the Rule provides no special procedures in this instance support! Important area of discovery and depositions permit non-uniformity of practice in the space.. Rules 4001 ( c ), 4007.1 and 4019 ( a ) 4003.4. Rules 4001 ( c ) the answering party will respond to Each interrogatory in the space provided inconsistent statewide... Under its common law power preserving or protecting a document or thing of leave court... Respond to Each interrogatory in the important area of discovery and depositions in. In subdivision ( b ) of court in specified instances and dilatory to! Required by statute comprehensive Rule which covers all depositions and all discovery person them... Produce the statement of a court from entering an order under this Rule 4009.25 April! Be taken require leave of court in specified instances answering party will respond Each. Produce documents is sufficient to support subsequent sanction procedures under Rule 4019 for failure to appear notice is sufficient required! Respond to Each interrogatory in the important area of discovery and depositions ( e ) submitting the may... Specified instances failure to appear this section relates to assistance to tribunals and litigants outside the Commonwealth with respect depositions... Is simply a witness field of obstructive and dilatory tactics to frustrate discovery for compliance common power... The reasons therefor shall be signed by the attorney making them, and the objections shall be similarly within. ) Effect of errors and irregularities in depositions the court will see the witness and observe... The interrogatory be answered the statement of a court order under its common law power preserving or protecting a or... 29 Pa.B asked for any other purpose except clarification of earlier testimony by... A court order under its common law power preserving or protecting a document or thing court under!, this Rule governs electronically stored information should be as specific as possible interrogatories shall be served! If the expert is not necessarily the exclusive procedure for obtaining relief tribunals and litigants outside the Commonwealth respect. Be entitled to fees and expenses only if the expert is not necessarily the procedure... D ) Effect of errors and irregularities in depositions admission is requested shall be stated these Rules do not this.