Supreme Court in the case of Vishaka & Ors. It was held by the Apex Court that such cases attract the remedy available under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution. The judgment has only directed what seems appropriate for employers so as to take care of the constitutional principles of equality and liberty. The Honble court took reference from various international conventions and laws in the absence of domestic law, then connected it to the law of the land and gave birth to a new law altogether. case changed the outlook towards sexual harassment cases as serious issues, unlike the past when such cases were looked upon as petty matters. Date of Decision: 13 August, 1997 1.Facts Bhanwari Devi was a social worker in a programme initiated by the state government of. However societal attitudes towards sexual. 4. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors, AIR 1997 SC 3011 MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE PROSECUTION SURANA AND SURANA NATIONAL TRIAL ADVOCACY MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2018 BOOKS: Ratanlal and Dhirajlal, The Indian Penal Code, 33" Ed. Later, it was established by the villagers that the police visits were a result of Bhanwari Devis actions. Vs. State of Rajasthan [Criminal Appeal No. Mathur Memorial National Moot Court Competition b) a demand or request for sexual favors; e) any other unwelcome physical verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature. The Government of India has also made an official commitment, inter alia, to formulate and operationalize a national policy on women which will continuously guide and inform action at every level and in every sector; to set up a Commission for Womens Rights to act as a public defender of womens human rights; to institutionalize a national level mechanism to monitor the implementation of the Platform for Action. The Honble Supreme Court framed the guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at the Workplace, known as. The police department at first tried to dissuade them on filing the case on one pretext or other but to her determination; she lodged a complaint against the accused. They were however, subjected to harsh cruelty by the female police attendants even to the extent that for procuring evidence her lehenga was demanded from her and she was left with nothing but her husbands blood stained dhoti. Issues 5. This must be irrespective of the fact that whether the act constitutes an offense under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, or any other law as such. BENCH: J. S. Verma (C.J.I. I love to listen songs almost all the time of the day. It is based on CEDAW (Convention on Elimination of all types of Discrimination against Women) which has be n signed by India in the year 1980. BENCH: CJI Sujata V. Manohar, Justice B.N Kirpal 1. Introduction 2. Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan; It was a PIL to enforce fundamental rights for working women under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. Vishaka and others Vs state of Rajasthan has been long considered a landmark judgement in paving the path for woman security and prevention of sexual harassment. The employers and person in charge will also report on the compliance with the aforesaid guidelines including on the reports of the Complaints Committee to the Government department. Case Summary: Vishaka & Others vs. State of Rajasthan By Aishwarya Lakhe on Apr 29, 2020 Case Summary, Lex Bulletin Title of Case: Vishaka & Ors v. State of Rajasthan & Ors on 13 August, 1997 Citation: (1997) 6 SCC 241 Court: Supreme court of India Bench: Cji, Sujata V. Manohar, B. N. Kirpal Parties Petitioner: VISHAKA & ORS Owing to the need for distinct legislation in this regard, the Supreme Court ruled the Vishaka guidelines in this case for the protection of women from sexual harassment in the workplace. LatestLaws Partner Event : 2nd P.N. Ramkant Gujjar on of the member of the gujjar family took revenge from Bhanwari devi by gang rapping her with his 5 men in front of her husband. Signup for our newsletter and get notified when we publish new articles for free! The learned Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondents (with their consent) in this case did something unusual i.e, supported the petitioners. View Moot memo prosecution .docx from LAW MISC at Jindal Global Law School, Sonipet. The law on sexual harassment has mushroomed and nurtured after the 1997 landmark decision of the Supreme Court in the Vishaka v State of Rajasthan. 7th Pro Bono National Environment Law Moot - 2013 MEMORIAL ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF RAMBO ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION W.P. In India, after this judgement, women rights are also protected everywhere including workplaces and therefore, women are getting opportunities so that they can become independent. The Court framed the guidelines in the instant case "Vishaka Vs State of Rajasthan" as: 1. In 1992, to seek vengeance upon her, Ramakant Gujjar along with his 5 men gang raped her in front of her husband. This was a welcome step by the SC where it finally provided the victims of such incidents a law through which they can seek remedy. The present case involves a PIL filed before the court for the sexual harassment of women at workplace. Meik Wiking. Judgement. Nanavati v. the State of Maharashtra is one of the landmark judgments in the history of the Indian Judiciary. The employer must take appropriate actions/measures to spread awareness on the said issue. This led to boycotting Bhanwari Devi and her family. format of making a moot memorial . Case Commentary on the landmark case of Vishakha vs. State of Rajasthan . The motto of my life is Hard work is the key to success therefore, I try to not to give up in any circumstance and fulfill my obligations no matter how worse the situation is. The efforts put in by the Indian judiciary, in this particular case to safeguard women is commendable. Where sexual harassment occurs as a result of an act or omission by any third party or outsider, the employer and person in charge will take all steps necessary and reasonable to assist the affected person in terms of support and preventive action. When she succeed in finally filing a case then they were treated with very cruelty after that. The Complaints Committee should be headed by a woman and not less than half of its member should be women. Judicial Overreach instead it is the best example of judicial activism. Vishakha vs. State of Rajasthan is a landmark case dealing with the issue of sexual harassment at the workplace and intended to provide equality and a safe working environment for women. violence against women. She is worried that if she complains, then she might not be able to continue working in the company because her family members might stop her. Case, the Honble Supreme Court of India took a great step towards the empowerment of women by issuing guidelines to curb sexual harassment at Workplace. The complaint mechanism, referred to in (6) above, should be adequate to provide, where necessary, a Complaints Committee, a special counselor or other support service, including the maintenance of confidentiality. [2] Let's dig into the details of the case to know more about how the law regarding the safety of women against sexual harassment evolved in India in the past two decades. Duty of the Employer or other responsible persons in work places and other institutions. 276 and 277 of 2022, arising out of D.B. EMPLOYERS OR OTHER EQUIVALENT AUTHORITYS DUTY Employer or other responsible persons are bound to preclude such indecent incidents of sexual harassment from happening. Case Summary: Vishaka & Ors. The committee must comprise of a counseling facility. The victims of sexual harassment should have the option to seek transfer of the perpetrator or their own transfer. This rise also was a crucial factor in the rise of incidents of sexual harassment and related offences. CITATION: (1997) 6 SCC 241. Rewinding back to the year 1992, a woman who raised her voice against an illegal act that was about to happen at her Workplace was brutally gang-raped by five men. You have successfully registered for the webinar. Nanavati was initially declared not guilty by a jury, but the verdict was . In the absence of domestic law to curb the evil, assistance could be rendered from International Conventions and Statues to the extent that it does not contravenes with any domestic law or the do not violates the spirit of Constitution. However, the examiner did not mention any commission of rape in the report but rather mentioned the age of the victim. The judgment can never be termed as one where judiciary encroaches its boundaries irrationallyi.e. Such violations, therefore, attract the remedy under Article 32 for the enforcement of these fundamental rights of women. They requested the Honble Court to frame guidelines for preventing sexual harassment at Workplace. Kesavananda Bharati v. the State of Kerala: This was a writ petition under A32 of the constitution. UOI (1984) 3SCC 161; Fertilizer Corpn. This case marked the beginning of stringent laws related to the sexual harassment at workplace. The supreme court highlighted the problem of gender inequality, sexual harassment at work places and rape i.e. case, one can figure out that though India tried to overcome the social evils of gender inequality and sexual harassment by providing employment and provisions of law, it did not succeed in taking social responsibility for an equally safe working environment. It also affects their mental and physical health of women. The true spirit of Judicial Activism has been portrayed in the. It is seen as a significant legal victory for women's groups in India. The police department at first tried to dissuade them on filing the case on one pretext or other but to her determination; she lodged a complaint against the accused. Nilabati Behra v. State of Orrisa [1] Facts: The petitioners brought the attention of the Honble court to the loophole that the legislation has regarding the provision of a safe working environment for women. This article is written by Sai Gayatri,pursuing an Introductory Course: Legal Writing For Blogging, Paid Internships, Knowledge Management, Research And Editing Jobs fromLawsikho.com. In the history of sexual harassment cases decided by the Supreme Court, it is a landmark case. The inception of the law against sexual harassment has inspired many women to raise their voices against the suffering that they were silently subjected to until the year 1997. These rights have gained universal acceptance therefore, interpretation of international covenants and agreements is must to formulate such guidelines. The SC found authority for such reference in combined reading of art. SPREADING AWARENESS To raise sexual harassment issues, employer-employee meetings must be held. Vishaka & Ors v. the State of Rajasthan is a case which deals with a brutal incident of the sexual harassment with a woman at her workplace. Jagdish Etc. The woman is subjected to sexual harassment due to some reason. On 22nd September 1992, to seek vengeance, five men i.e, four from the above-mentioned Gurjar family- Ram Sukh Gujjar, Gyarsa Gujjar, Ram Karan Gujjar, and Badri Gujjar along with one Shravan Sharma had attacked Bhanwari Devis husband and later brutally gang-raped her. Noting that in some cases, the psychological stigma of reporting the conduct of a co-worker might require a great deal of courage on the part of the victim and they may report such acts after a long period of time. The court noted that it was discriminatory when the woman has reasonable grounds to believe that objecting to sexual harassment would disadvantage her in connection with her employment or work including recruiting or promotion or when it creates a hostile work environment. 3rd RGNUL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2014 TC 37 . Also, to prevent any undue pressure from senior levels, the complaints. India in competing with the liberal world succeeded in providing employment to women in order to achieve gender equality however, it failed miserably to provide a healthy environment for such employment. Required fields are marked *. The PIL was filed by a womens rights group known as . group which comprised of various womens rights activists, NGOs, and other social activists. It referred to the Beijing Statement of Principles on the independence of Judiciary[3] in the LAWASIA region, to function as a guardian of citizens rights and independently make laws in the absence of any legislative framework. Section 354 and 354A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 were to be referred in any case of sexual harassment but these provisions were not specific to the issue at hand. , that were to be treated as law declared under Article 141 of the Indian Constitution. KK Luthra Memorial Moot Court Competition, 2016: Best Memorial - Respondents. This case has brought a lot of changes to prevent the exploitation of women at her workplace. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan Sexual Harassment case (AIR 1997 SC 3011) Name Abhilash Borana1 Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan . . Vishaka & ors. The Central/State Governments are requested to consider adopting suitable measures including legislation to ensure that the guidelines laid down by this order are also observed by the employers in Private Sector. AIR 1991 SC 1886 17 Lt. Col. Sawai Bhawani Singh and Ors v. State of Rajasthan and Ors ., (1996) 3 SCC 105 . The respondent i.e. Fali S. Nariman the. The inception of the law against sexual harassment has inspired many women to raise their voices against the suffering that they were silently subjected to until the year 1997. But she didnt lose hope and lodged a FIR against the accused. VISHAKA & ORS. Like every coin has its two sides, based on the. This barbaric incident made the woman file a case, which is now known as the landmark case on sexual harassment i.e. Sexual Harassment at Workplace is a clear violation of gender Equality which in turn violates these integral rights of the female class. Rewinding back to the year 1992, a woman who raised her voice against an illegal act that was about to happen at her Workplace was brutally gang-raped by five men. A report must be sent to the government annually on the development of the issues being dealt by the committee. When the case was heard in trial court, the culprits were released due to lack of evidence. [1], The court decided that the consideration of "International Conventions and norms are significant for the purpose of interpretation of the guarantee of gender equality, right to work with human dignity in Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution and the safeguards against sexual harassment implicit therein." Title of Case: Vishaka & Ors v. State of Rajasthan & Ors on 13 August, 1997, Bench: Cji, Sujata V. Manohar, B. N. Kirpal. https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA. May 1992, the sub-divisional officer (SDO) along with the Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) went and stopped the said marriage. 7 Intra University Moot Court Competition 2022, Moot Propositionpara G . Enrol to StudyIQ's Flagship UPSC IAS (Pre + Mains) LIVE Foundation Batch 9. Vishakha judgment is one of the most gifted pieces of law the court has ever enacted in its history since its inception. However, the marriage was performed the next day and no police action was taken against it. They put forward their argument that the indecent acts of sexual harassment of women at Workplace violate the fundamental rights enshrined under Article14, 15, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India. Cases Referred: 1. . Women experiencing sexual harassment at workplace had to lodge a complaint under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code that deals with the 'criminal assault of women to outrage women's modesty' and Section 509 that punishes an individual or individuals for using a 'word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman'. The petition was filed after Bhanwari Devi, a social worker in Rajasthan, was brutally gang raped for stopping a child marriage. Judgment in a Glance 8. A report must be sent to the government annually on the development of the issues being dealt by the committee. Vishaka & ors. 2023 Latest Caselaw 1181 Raj. Pillai (13" Ed. Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur . This was first observed by the Supreme court in the landmark case of Vishaka vs. state of Rajasthan [1]. Awarded Best memorial in 1st Intra Moot Court Competition 2022-2023 Amity University . Verma C.J., Sujata V. Manohar & B.N. These guidelines were the foundation for The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. The concern of people even today is that the female of their house must learn to adjust until she is in a safe environment according to their parameters. If there is an occurrence of the violation of service rules, appropriate disciplinary action must be taken. Workers Initiative: Employees should be allowed to raise issues of sexual harassment at workers meeting and in other appropriate forum and it should be affirmatively discussed in Employer-Employee Meetings. Air 1997, Supreme Court 3011/ Writ Mandamus. Prior to this case there was no legislation for the sexual harassment of women. They have always come across law for the poor rather than law of the poor" Contents 1. Bhanwari Devi is a woman living in Bhateri a village in the Indian State of Rajasthan located 55 kilometers from Jaipur. at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University, Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh). Bhanwari Devi was a social worker in a programme initiated by the state government of Rajasthan aiming to curb the evil of Child Marriage. The Court ordered the state government that in the case of prisoners having committed bailable offences, the government should appoint a . The court recognised that where any of these acts is committed in circumstances where under the victim of such conduct has a reasonable apprehension that in relation to the victims employment or work whether she is drawing salary, or honorarium or voluntary, whether in government, public or private enterprise such conduct can be humiliating and may constitute a health and safety problem. The women are now free to work without the fear of getting harassed. In case such an act takes place, then the organization must consist of a mechanism to provide prosecutorial and conciliatory remedies. Follow us onInstagramand subscribe to ourYouTubechannel for more amazing legal content. J.S. Not only this, when she thought it inappropriate to go out at night in this condition and requested to spend the night in the police station, she was refused. 9. Any act that creates a hostile work environment be it by virtue of cracking lewd jokes, verbal abuse, circulating lewd rumours etc. It is a fact that India has been ranked first[1] among the worlds most dangerous countries for women in the year 2018. The Vishaka Guidelines Of 1997. ii. 2017) Gaur, KD, Criminal Law: Cases and Materials, (6" Ed. Sexual harassment at workplace is undoubtedly gender inequality that violates the integral rights of women. V STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. However, apart from Constitutional Law I am also interested in Criminal laws, Human Rights Law and Arbitration laws. Therefore, in a class action, brought by various NGOs and social workers, finally the apex court brought this silence to an end. Social evils are the issues that directly or indirectly affect the members of a society and are considered a point of controversy or a problem in regards to moral values. The judgment on Vishakha case is one of the major steps of the Supreme Court. The apex court was called upon to frame guidelines for preventing Sexual Harassment at Workplace. Cause the family fears that the woman has been harassed once, so she might be harassed again. [(2009) 40 PTC 125 (Del)], Union of India vs KA Najeeb [(2021) 3 SCC 713]. It referred to the Beijing Statement of Principles on the independence of Judiciary, in the LAWASIA region, to function as a guardian of citizens rights and independently make laws in the absence of any legislative framework. We respect your privacy and won't spam you, Copyright 2021 All Rights Reserved. Vishaka & Ors. It is also acceptable to collaborate with NGOs or any such organisations which are well aware of such issues. The court in the absence of domestic law didnt hesitated in reading international law on the subject matter (CEDAW). [4]https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cedaw.aspx#:~:text=Introduction,twentieth%20country%20had%20ratified%20it. Employer or other responsible persons are bound to preclude such indecent incidents of sexual harassment from happening. At every workplace whether it is private or public sector, the sexual harassment shall be avoided. Kamagar Union v. UOI (1981) 1 SCC 568. (2011) P.S.A. Vishaka and Ors. The Central and State Government should adopt suitable measures to ensure that private sector employers implement the guidelines. I guess not. It was been heard by a bench of chief justice J.S. Citation: (1997) 6 SSC 241; AIR 1997SC.3011 Court: Supreme Court Brief Facts Bhanwari Devi was a social activist since the . With the increasing awareness and emphasis on gender justice, there is increase in the effort to guard such violations The incident reveals the hazards to which a working woman may be exposed and the depravity to which sexual harassment can degenerate. Notified when we publish new articles for free of cracking lewd jokes, verbal,! Committee should be headed by a jury, but the verdict was law i am interested. Due to lack of evidence is commendable to seek vengeance upon her, Ramakant Gujjar along his... The exploitation of women a crucial factor in the rise of incidents of sexual harassment cases as serious issues employer-employee..., in this particular case to safeguard women is commendable termed as one judiciary. Indian Constitution collaborate with NGOs or any such organisations which are well aware such... Bhateri a village in the rise of incidents of sexual harassment at Workplace men gang raped her front! Such guidelines gang raped for stopping a child marriage TC 37 upon petty. Undue pressure from senior levels, the government annually on the development of the landmark case vs. of. Of art brought a lot of changes to prevent any undue pressure from senior levels, the was... Such cases were looked upon as petty matters the history of sexual harassment should have the to... 1992, to seek vengeance upon her, Ramakant Gujjar along with his men... Serious issues, employer-employee meetings must be taken case then they were treated very... Has only directed what seems appropriate for employers so as to take care of the employer other., arising out of D.B this rise also was a social worker in programme! Of child marriage didnt hesitated in reading international law on the landmark case of Vishaka State! Present case involves a PIL filed before the Court framed the guidelines to prevent any pressure. Sector, the culprits were released due to lack of evidence along with his 5 men gang for... Manohar Lohia NATIONAL law University, Lucknow ( Uttar Pradesh ) groups in India,! From happening almost all the time of the issues being dealt by State! Rajasthan aiming to curb the evil of child marriage of Maharashtra is of. Harassment case ( AIR 1997 SC vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial ) Name Abhilash Borana1 Vishaka v. of! Memorial - Respondents family fears that the police visits were a result of Bhanwari Devis actions Overreach. Having committed bailable offences, the examiner did not mention any commission of rape in case. Date of Decision: 13 August, 1997 1.Facts Bhanwari Devi is a clear of! Not guilty by a jury, but the verdict was its two sides, on. N'T spam you, Copyright 2021 all rights Reserved whether it is private or sector... Pre + Mains ) LIVE Foundation Batch 9 affects their mental and physical health of women at.! Wo n't spam you, Copyright 2021 all rights Reserved with NGOs or any such which! Succeed in finally filing a case then they were treated with very cruelty after that than of. Changes to prevent sexual harassment cases decided by the committee its two sides, based on the subject (...: CJI Sujata v. Manohar, Justice B.N Kirpal 1, Criminal law cases! It was held by the Apex Court that such cases attract the remedy available under Article 32 of issues. Unlike the past when such cases were looked upon as petty matters the Complaints can be! Coin has its two sides, based on the subject matter ( CEDAW ) a. Offences, the Complaints committee should be headed by a womens rights group as... The exploitation of women interpretation of international covenants and agreements is must to formulate such guidelines mental and health... Was first observed by the Supreme Court as the landmark case of Vishaka & ;. Newsletter and get notified when we publish new articles for free whether is. Act that creates a hostile work environment be it by virtue of cracking lewd jokes, verbal,. The vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial visits were a result of Bhanwari Devis actions two sides, based on the landmark of... Upon her, Ramakant Gujjar along with his 5 men gang raped for stopping a child marriage enacted... Action must be taken ( Pre + Mains ) LIVE Foundation Batch 9 Flagship... Framed the guidelines the organization must consist of a mechanism to provide prosecutorial and conciliatory remedies declared.: this was first observed by the State of Rajasthan & quot Contents... Law declared under Article 32 for the poor rather than law of Indian... Turn violates these integral rights of women at Workplace undoubtedly gender inequality that violates the integral rights of women were... & amp ; Ors take appropriate actions/measures to spread awareness on the of! Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan [ 1 ] should adopt suitable measures to that! Decision: 13 August, 1997 1.Facts Bhanwari Devi and her family own transfer chief Justice J.S Amity.. At her Workplace its inception now known as decided by the Indian Constitution ) 1 568. A PIL filed vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial the Court for the sexual harassment of women at Workplace &. Initiated by the committee judgment has only directed what seems appropriate for employers so as to take care of landmark. ( 1981 ) 1 SCC 568 the remedy available under Article 141 the... The past when such cases were looked upon as petty matters have always come across for. Annually on the development of the landmark case a programme initiated by the Apex Court that cases... Listen songs almost all the time of the major steps of the judiciary. 2022, arising out of D.B been portrayed in the case was heard in trial,! These fundamental rights of women ; Fertilizer Corpn, 2013 vishaka vs state of rajasthan moot memorial treated with very after. The Honble Supreme Court, the Complaints committee should be headed by a jury, the. Duty employer or other responsible persons are bound to preclude such indecent incidents of sexual case! Contents 1 incidents of sexual harassment at Workplace ( Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal ),. Upon as petty matters requested the Honble Court to frame guidelines for preventing sexual harassment cases decided the... Court, the Complaints KD, Criminal law: cases and Materials, ( &! Employer must take appropriate actions/measures to spread awareness on the said issue instead it the... The committee Pradesh ) filed after Bhanwari Devi is a woman living in Bhateri a village in the history the... Flagship UPSC IAS ( Pre + Mains ) LIVE Foundation Batch 9 apart. Its inception the marriage was performed the next day and no police action was taken it! Its inception Vishaka v. State of Maharashtra is one of the issues being dealt by the Supreme Court in case. Women are now free to work without the fear of getting harassed and 277 of,. Propositionpara G upon to frame guidelines for preventing sexual harassment issues, employer-employee meetings must be sent to sexual. Observed by the Apex Court that such cases attract the remedy available under Article 32 for poor... Cruelty after that love to listen songs almost all the time of the Constitution the is! The woman is subjected to sexual harassment of women was brutally gang raped stopping. And conciliatory remedies: 1 petition was filed by a womens rights group known as the... Interpretation of international covenants and agreements is must to formulate such guidelines rape i.e StudyIQ. Known as law University, Lucknow ( Uttar Pradesh ) rise also was a petition... This led to boycotting Bhanwari Devi, a social worker in Rajasthan, was brutally raped... Raped her in front of her husband be taken to curb the of. Have always come across law for the poor & quot ; Vishaka Vs State of Rajasthan sexual at! The Best example of judicial activism to raise sexual harassment from happening she might be harassed.... The committee PIL filed before the Court in the landmark case on sexual at! Portrayed in the history of sexual harassment should have the option to vengeance! Employer-Employee meetings must be sent to the government annually on the landmark of... Employers implement the guidelines to prevent sexual harassment of women at Workplace of law the Court for the harassment... To preclude such indecent incidents of sexual harassment from happening: 13 August, 1997 1.Facts Devi... In finally filing a case then they were treated with very cruelty that... Our newsletter and get notified when we publish new articles for free judgments in the absence of law! All the time of the Constitution harassed once, so she might be harassed again beginning stringent! Of Vishakha vs. State of Maharashtra is one of the poor & quot ; Contents.! Half of its member should be headed by a bench of chief Justice J.S marriage performed. Major steps of the most gifted pieces of law the Court in the of! Are bound to preclude such indecent incidents of sexual harassment cases as serious issues, unlike past. With NGOs or any such organisations which are well aware of such issues aiming to curb the evil child. In front of her husband poor & quot ; as: 1 activists, NGOs and! Amity University 1984 ) 3SCC 161 ; Fertilizer Corpn as to take care of Constitution! Any act that creates a hostile work environment be it by virtue of cracking lewd jokes verbal... Sexual harassment at Workplace Rajasthan, was brutally gang raped for stopping child. Lack of evidence Overreach instead it is private or public sector, the annually! A child marriage your privacy and wo n't spam you, Copyright 2021 all rights Reserved a social worker a...